Borna Libertines Shop

Posted on April 15, 2025November 8, 2025 by Borna Libeertines

Paris Metro’s Ban on Hockney Poster: A Controversy Explored

Descriptive alt text for image 2 - This image shows important visual content that enhances the user experience and provides context for the surrounding text.

Descriptive alt text for image 3 - This image shows important visual content that enhances the user experience and provides context for the surrounding text.

The Paris Metro recently banned promotional posters for David Hockney’s upcoming retrospective at the Fondation Louis Vuitton because the image showed the artist holding a cigarette. This decision, based on France’s strict anti-tobacco advertising laws, has stirred controversy and frustration. Hockney himself called the ban “complete madness,” pointing out the irony that a painting depicting him smoking was allowed, while the photograph was not.

The incident has ignited a wider conversation about the balance between public health regulations and artistic freedom, especially in a city celebrated for its rich cultural and revolutionary history. Critics argue that such censorship risks stifling creativity and undermining the role of art in public spaces.

Meanwhile, the Fondation Louis Vuitton exhibition, running from April to August 2025, promises a stunning retrospective of Hockney’s work over the past 25 years, featuring over 400 pieces including iconic paintings, digital art, and immersive installations. Despite the poster controversy, the show is set to be a major celebration of one of the world’s most influential contemporary artists.

David Hockney’s Reaction

The 86-year-old British artist expressed his frustration with the Paris Metro’s decision, describing it as “complete madness” and an example of excessive control . Hockney, known for his advocacy of personal freedom, found the distinction between the banned photograph and the permitted painting particularly perplexing, as both depicted him smoking. His reaction highlights the tension between artistic expression and public health regulations in France. Sir Norman Rosenthal, a curator, echoed Hockney’s sentiments, calling the decision “beyond comprehension” and contrary to Paris’s historical association with artistic liberty and revolution.

Posted on April 10, 2025November 8, 2025 by Borna Libeertines

Ethical Concerns Surrounding AI-Generated Art

The rise of AI-generated art has sparked a range of ethical debates that question the boundaries of creativity, ownership, and fairness in the art world. While these technologies offer exciting possibilities, they also raise critical concerns that must be addressed to ensure responsible use.

Below are the key ethical issues surrounding AI-generated art:

Authorship and Ownership

AI-generated art challenges traditional notions of authorship. When an artwork is created using AI, it becomes unclear who the rightful creator is: the developer of the AI model, the user who inputs prompts, or the AI system itself. This ambiguity complicates intellectual property rights and raises questions about how to attribute credit fairly.
Additionally, AI systems often replicate styles or elements from existing works, leading to accusations of plagiarism or uncredited derivative works. For example, artists have expressed frustration over their unique styles being mimicked by AI tools without acknowledgment or compensation.

Copyright and Legal Issues:

AI training datasets frequently include billions of publicly available images, many of which are copyrighted. These images are used without explicit consent from their creators, raising significant legal and ethical concerns:

Unconsented Use of Artwork: Artists often discover their work has been included in training datasets without permission. Websites like “Have I Been Trained” allow users to check if their images were used in this way, highlighting the lack of transparency in data sourcing.

Legal Uncertainty: Current copyright laws are ill-equipped to handle cases involving AI-generated works. For instance, if an AI-generated piece closely resembles a copyrighted artwork, determining liability becomes complex.
These issues have already led to lawsuits against companies developing AI art tools, emphasizing the need for clearer legal frameworks.

Devaluation of Human Creativity

AI’s ability to generate high-quality art in seconds has raised concerns about the devaluation of human effort and skill:

Effort vs. Automation: Traditional artists spend years honing their craft, while AI can replicate similar results almost instantaneously. This has led to backlash, such as when an AI-generated piece won first place at a Colorado State Fair art competition in 2022, sparking outrage among artists who felt their work was undervalued.

Market Saturation: The ease of creating visually impressive images with AI could lead to market oversaturation, making it harder for human artists to stand out or earn a living.

Bias and Ethical Representation

AI systems are only as unbiased as the data they are trained on. Unfortunately, many datasets reflect societal biases, which can manifest in problematic ways in AI-generated art:

Stereotypes and Misrepresentation: AI models may perpetuate harmful stereotypes or produce hyper-sexualized or culturally insensitive imagery.

Harmful Outputs: Without proper safeguards, AI can generate offensive or inappropriate content that damages reputations or causes harm to marginalized communities.
Ensuring diversity and inclusivity in training datasets is essential to mitigate these risks.

Transparency and Accountability

The lack of transparency in how AI-generated art is created raises ethical concerns:

Misrepresentation: Some users present AI-generated works as entirely human-made, misleading audiences about the creative process.

Accountability for Harmful Outputs: When an AI system produces controversial or offensive content, it is unclear whether responsibility lies with the developer, the user, or the platform hosting the work.
Transparency about how AI tools function and how outputs are generated is crucial for maintaining trust.

Ethical Use vs. Exploitation

The ethical use of AI tools hinges on whether they complement human creativity or replace it entirely:

Collaboration Over Replacement: Many argue that AI should serve as a tool to enhance human creativity rather than replace artists altogether. Ethical usage involves leveraging AI for ideation and experimentation while maintaining a human touch in the final product.

Impact on Artistic Traditions: The widespread adoption of AI-generated art raises concerns about its impact on cultural heritage and traditional artistic practices.

Addressing Ethical Concerns
To navigate these challenges responsibly, several steps can be taken:

Transparent Data Practices: Companies developing AI tools must disclose the sources of their training datasets and ensure that copyrighted material is used ethically.

Legal Protections: Governments should update copyright laws to address the specific issues related to AI-generated works.

Fair Attribution: Systems should be developed to credit original artists whose work contributes to training datasets.

Bias Mitigation: Developers must prioritize diversity and inclusivity in dataset curation.

Educational Initiatives: Artists should be educated on how to use AI tools responsibly and effectively while preserving their unique creative voice.

AI-generated art represents both an exciting frontier and a complex ethical landscape. By addressing these concerns thoughtfully, we can ensure that this technology enriches artistic expression without undermining the integrity of human creativity or fairness in the art world.

Posted on April 4, 2025November 9, 2025 by Borna Libeertines

Banksy’s “Laugh Now” Artwork Theft: Art Crime Strikes Belfast Gallery

The recent theft of a valuable Banksy print from a Belfast gallery highlights the continuing allure and black market demand for the anonymous street artist’s work. A signed limited edition of the iconic “Laugh Now” print, valued at £95,000, was stolen from a gallery at Lanyon Quay in Belfast, with two men subsequently appearing in court charged with the theft.

The Theft and Court Proceedings

Two Belfast residents, Adil Hajjaj, 49, and Ahmed Bouazzi, 39, appeared at Belfast Magistrates’ Court accused of stealing the valuable Banksy print on Wednesday. According to court proceedings, the theft involved a calculated approach where Bouazzi allegedly distracted a lone gallery employee while Hajjaj removed the artwork and placed it in a shopping bag[2]. Police apprehended both men approximately 20 minutes later on the Ormeau Road, recovering the artwork from a bag carried by Bouazzi[2].

The court’s decision reflected differing assessments of the two defendants. District Judge Steven Keown denied bail to Hajjaj, citing an “unmanageable” risk of reoffending, and remanded him in custody until May 2nd. Bouazzi, however, was granted bail with the condition that he not enter the gallery[2]. Interestingly, the defense solicitor for Hajjaj claimed his client was unaware of the artwork’s significant value, arguing that such a recognizable piece would be “too hot to handle” on the black market[2].

The Investigation and Recovery

The swift recovery of the artwork demonstrates the challenges thieves face when attempting to profit from stealing high-profile art. Recognizable works by famous artists often prove difficult to resell due to their notoriety and the close-knit nature of the legitimate art market. In this case, police were able to quickly identify and apprehend the suspects based on descriptions provided after the theft[2].

The “Laugh Now” Artwork: History and Significance

The stolen artwork represents one of Banksy’s most recognizable and culturally significant creations. “Laugh Now” first emerged in 2002 as a commissioned six-meter-long stenciled mural for the Ocean Rooms nightclub in Brighton, featuring ten monkeys in a line[3]. The original mural provided the template for later reproductions, including the limited edition prints released in 2003[5].

Artistic Elements and Symbolism

The artwork depicts a monochrome chimpanzee with slumped shoulders and downcast demeanor, wearing a sandwich board bearing the ominous message: “Laugh now, but one day we’ll be in charge”[3][5]. While the majority of the image features clean, stenciled lines characteristic of Banksy’s style, the primate’s feet dissolve into dripping paint, reminiscent of wet ink on spray-painted murals[3].

The somber monkey with its provocative message has been interpreted as a powerful commentary on oppression and potential uprising. Art critics suggest it predicts that the downtrodden will eventually rise against their tormentors, possibly referencing the mistreatment of primates by humans for entertainment or scientific testing[3][5]. The piece brilliantly balances provocative social commentary with dark humor, a hallmark of Banksy’s approach[5].

Editions and Valuation

The “Laugh Now” print exists in several editions:

150 signed prints
600 unsigned prints
69 artist’s proofs[3][5]

The stolen print, valued at £95,000, was one of the signed limited editions, highlighting the significant market value that Banksy’s work commands in today’s art market[2]. The artwork’s authenticity is certified by Pest Control, Banksy’s verification service[5].

Banksy: The Anonymous Art Phenomenon

Banksy began his career spray-painting buildings in Bristol, England, and has evolved into one of the world’s most recognized and influential contemporary artists[4]. Despite his global fame and the multi-million-dollar values attached to his work, Banksy has maintained his anonymity throughout his career, adding to his mystique and appeal[4][6].

Distinctive Style and Recurring Themes

Animals frequently appear as motifs throughout Banksy’s work, often serving as vehicles for commentary on society and humanity’s place within it[5]. The chimpanzee in “Laugh Now” joins other popular animal-centered works like “Love Rat,” “Barcode,” and “HMV”[5]. His art consistently features dark humor, satire, and subversive epigrams that deliver concise yet powerful social or political commentary[6].

Record-Breaking Auction Prices

Banksy’s works have achieved remarkable prices at auction. In 2021, his self-shredding artwork “Love is in the Bin” (formerly “Girl With Balloon”) sold for a record £18.5 million ($25.4 million) at Sotheby’s in London. This followed the famous 2018 auction where the artwork self-destructed immediately after being sold, in what many considered the “ultimate Banksy artwork”.

Conclusion

The theft of the “Laugh Now” print in Belfast represents more than just a crime against a gallery; it highlights the enduring cultural and financial value of Banksy’s art. The irony of stealing an artwork that itself comments on power dynamics and oppression is not lost in this situation. As Banksy’s works continue to appreciate in value and cultural significance, they remain targets for theft despite their recognizability, making them difficult to resell.

The chimpanzee’s foreboding message—”Laugh now, but one day we’ll be in charge”—continues to resonate with audiences worldwide, speaking to power imbalances and the potential for dramatic social change. As this case proceeds through the legal system, it serves as a reminder of art’s power to provoke, inspire, and maintain value even in an ever-changing cultural landscape.

Sources


[1] image.jpg https://pplx-res.cloudinary.com/image/upload/v1743781831/user_uploads/ypVIYabNEkeOjtJ/image.jpg
[2] c5yrdpkn406o.amp https://www-bbc-co-uk.cdn.ampproject.org/c/s/www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c5yrdpkn406o.amp
[3] 10 Facts About Banksy's Laugh Now | MyArtbroker https://www.myartbroker.com/artist-banksy/10-facts/10-facts-about-banksys-laugh-now
[4] Banksy artwork that self-shredded sells for record $25.4 million at auction https://www.cbsnews.com/news/banksy-love-is-in-the-bin-shredded-artwork-sells-record-25-4-million-auction/
[5] Buy Banksy Laugh Now | Meaning & History | Andipa Editions https://andipaeditions.com/laugh-now-by-banksy/
[6] Banksy - 20th Century & Contemporary Art Evening Sale in Association with Poly Auction Hong Kong Tuesday, June 8, 2021 | Phillips https://www.phillips.com/detail/banksy/HK010121/22
[7] Shredded Banksy artwork sells for $25.4 million at auction https://www.pbs.org/newshour/arts/shredded-banksy-artwork-sells-for-25-4-million-at-auction
[8] Art Theft Statistics (2025): Startling Reality Revealed - Smart Locks Guide https://smartlocksguide.com/art-theft-statistics/
[9] How thieves sell stolen art https://www.startribune.com/how-thieves-sell-stolen-art/175655141
[10] Stolen artworks harder to recover amid rise in ransom demands, lawyers warn https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/09/23/stolen-artworks-harder-recover-amid-rise-ransom-demands/
[11] 10 infamous art thefts that kept the world guessing https://www.standard.co.uk/culture/stolen-art-famous-painting-thefts-a4002906.html
[12] 2 Men Are Charged With Stealing a Famous Banksy Artwork https://time.com/7021143/2-men-charged-with-stealing-banksy-artwork-london/
[13] Laugh Now (10), 2002 - Banksy Explained https://banksyexplained.com/laugh-now-2002-7/
[14] Laugh now but one day hi-res stock photography and images - Alamy https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo/laugh-now-but-one-day.html
[15] Laugh Now, 2003 - Banksy Explained https://banksyexplained.com/laugh-now-2003/
[16] Tracking recent trends in the International market for art theft https://www.academia.edu/96059729/Tracking_recent_trends_in_the_International_market_for_art_theft
[17] The Black Market For Stolen Art http://www.oneincomedollar.com/2019/05/the-black-market-for-stolen-art.html
[18] What It Takes to Recover a Stolen Work of Art https://www.artsy.net/article/artsy-editorial-what-it-takes-to-recover-a-stolen-work-of-art
[19] The Art of Banksy Humour—Satire, Spray Paint & the Politics Beneath the Punchline https://maddoxgallery.com/news/421-the-art-of-banksy-humour-and-politics/
[20] These Banksy prints have just fetched more than £400,000 at auction https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/art/news/banksy-prints-sell-for-ps435-000-at-auction-10011789.html
[21] Laugh Now by Banksy Background & Meaning | MyArtBroker https://www.myartbroker.com/artist-banksy/series-laugh-now
[22] Shredded Banksy Artwork Sells for $25.4 Million at Auction https://www.nbcboston.com/entertainment/entertainment-news/shredded-banksy-artwork-sells-for-25-4-million-at-auction/2516982/?os=vbLhPdr7HY
[23] Laugh Now, 2006 - Banksy Explained https://banksyexplained.com/laugh-now-2006/
[24] Laugh Now, 2000 - Banksy Explained https://banksyexplained.com/laugh-now-2000/
[25] Phillips Auction House to Accept Crypto for Banksy Artwork Sale https://www.coindesk.com/business/2021/05/07/phillips-auction-house-to-accept-crypto-for-banksy-artwork-sale
[26] A Guide to Banksy's Monkeys | Guide | MyArtBroker https://www.myartbroker.com/artist-banksy/guides/a-guide-to-banksys-monkeys
[27] Laugh Now | Banksy | 2022 | Sotheby's https://www.sothebys.com/en/buy/auction/2022/banksy-2/laugh-now-2
[28] Banksy | Laugh Now (2005) | Artsy https://www.artsy.net/artwork/banksy-laugh-now-97
[29] FACES OF ART: “Laugh now but one day we’ll be in charge”. Modern social problems in Banksy’s art https://www.europub.co.uk/articles/faces-of-art-laugh-now-but-one-day-well-be-in-charge-modern-social-problems-in-banksys-art-A-52908
[30] Buyer of $1.4 million Banksy painting describes her reaction when it self-destructed https://www.cbsnews.com/news/banksy-painting-shredded-buyer-describes-her-reaction-when-artwork-self-destructed-at-auction/
[31] Legendary Art Theft Cases We Cannot Forget | Widewalls https://www.widewalls.ch/magazine/art-theft-cases
[32] Suspended prison sentence and €30,000 fine for Banksy theft in Paris https://www.euronews.com/culture/2024/06/20/suspended-prison-sentence-and-30000-fine-for-banksy-theft-in-paris
[33] How technology is changing the way we tackle art theft | Apollo Magazine https://www.apollo-magazine.com/how-technology-is-changing-the-way-we-tackle-art-theft/
[34] The art market: A victim of its own success https://courier.unesco.org/en/articles/art-market-victim-its-own-success
[35] In Art Recovery, Cash May Be the Deciding Factor https://observer.com/2023/11/in-art-recovery-cash-may-be-the-deciding-factor/
[36] The 10 most infamous art thefts and heists of all time https://faroutmagazine.co.uk/the-10-infamous-art-thefts-of-all-time/
[37] Gallery manager ‘horrified’ by theft of Banksy artwork https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/london-banksy-kingston-crown-court-police-metropolitan-police-b1181940.html
[38] Art and crime - the dark side of the antiquities trade https://www.euronews.com/business/2022/04/13/art-and-crime-the-dark-side-of-the-antiquities-trade
[39] Finding Buyers for Stolen Art https://abcnews.go.com/Business/story?id=235770&page=1
[40] Top Ten Art Thefts https://journals.library.columbia.edu/index.php/lawandarts/announcement/view/237
[41] Banksy's Bataclan mural was stolen, now the thieves are facing trial https://www.euronews.com/culture/2022/06/08/thieves-who-stole-banksy-s-bataclan-mural-go-on-trial-in-paris
[42] From Rarity To Illegality: Delving Into The Black Market For Antiques https://financialcrimeacademy.org/black-market-for-antiques/

Posted on March 22, 2025November 9, 2025 by Borna Libeertines

George Stinney: A Tragic Tale of Racial Injustice

George Stinney Jr. was only 14 years old when he was executed in 1944, becoming the youngest American in the 20th century to be sentenced to death and executed with a confirmed date of birth. His story is a stark reminder of racial bias and failures within the justice system.

The Crime and Conviction

In March 1944, Betty June Binnicker, 11, and Mary Emma Thames, 8, were found murdered in Alcolu, South Carolina. The victims were white. Stinney, a young African American boy, was quickly arrested.

Background: Alcolu was a segregated town, with limited interaction between white and black residents.
The Arrest and “Confession”: Stinney and his older brother were arrested. His brother was released, but George was held. He was questioned without his parents or a lawyer present and allegedly confessed to the murders. This confession was the primary evidence against him.
The Trial: The trial was held just a month after the murders. Stinney was provided with a court-appointed counsel who did little to defend him. The all-white jury deliberated for only ten minutes before finding him guilty.
The Sentence: Judge Philip H. Stoll sentenced Stinney to death by electrocution.

A Flawed Process

Several factors point to the injustice of Stinney’s conviction:

Lack of Due Process: Stinney was interrogated without legal representation or parental supervision.
Inadequate Defense: His court-appointed lawyer presented a weak defense.
Racial Bias: The racially charged atmosphere of the time likely influenced the outcome of the trial.
Age: The execution of a 14-year-old was an incredibly harsh sentence, even in the Jim Crow South.

Execution and Aftermath

George Stinney was executed on June 16, 1944. He was so small for the electric chair that a Bible was used as a booster seat.

Reopening the Case

Decades later, renewed interest in the case led to re-examining the evidence.

Motives for Reopening: Historians, lawyers, and civil rights groups began to question the fairness of the trial and the validity of the conviction.
Vacated Conviction: In 2014, Judge Carmen Mullen vacated Stinney’s conviction, ruling that he had not received a fair trial and that his Sixth Amendment rights had been violated.

Lingering Doubts and Alternate Suspects

While Stinney’s family and supporters celebrated the overturning of his conviction, some relatives of the victims maintain his guilt. After Stinney’s exoneration, George Washington Burke Jr. has been the subject of speculation as a possible suspect for the murders.

Lessons Learned

The George Stinney case serves as a chilling example of how racial prejudice and a flawed legal system can lead to tragic consequences. It highlights the importance of due process, adequate legal representation, and the need to address systemic biases within the criminal justice system.

Citations:

America Hero Painting by Borna Libertines

Posted on July 17, 2024March 20, 2025 by Borna Libeertines

Art Exhibition by Borna Libertines at Hotel Lone, Rovinj July 16 to September 02, 2024

Art Exhibition by Borna Libertines at Hotel Lone, Rovinj July 16 to September 02, 2024. Collection of Collage Graffiti Paintings done in Mexico City from the period of 2021 – 2024

On display are eight painting

man and sea by borna libertines — art is dangerous

Posted on July 15, 2024March 20, 2025 by Borna Libeertines

Art is Dangerous Exhibition at Hotel Lone by Borna Libertines

Art is Dangerous Exhibition at Hotel Lone by Borna Libertines from July 16 to September 02, 2024. Borna will present several 6 to 9 paintings in the period 2021/2024. Painting are done in New York, Mexico, and Croatia.

dead man in the room presentation 1 — afterlife corazon 1 1

Posted on July 8, 2024March 20, 2025 by Borna Libeertines

Art Exhibit at Hotel Lone by Borna Libertines

Preparation for an Art Exhibit at Hotel Lone, something about the Hotel. Combining a unique and functional design over six floors, located by the sea and the centuries-old Golden Cape forest park, this hotel is a year-round leisure and business destination. Just like a contemporary art museum, every detail of the Hotel Lone, awakens your desire to explore.

hotel lone exhibition by borna Libertines — hotel lone

hotel lone inside gallery by Borna Libertines — hotel lone inside the gallery

The exhibition will run from July to September. The space in the hotel lobby shown above is where Borna Libertines Art will be exhibited. Borna will display 9 to 10 art pieces.

hotel lone inside gallery — hotel lone Inside lobby

More about Hotel Lone is on the website https://www.maistra.com/properties/hotel-lone/#/gallery

Posted on July 7, 2024November 9, 2025 by Borna Libeertines

Borna Libertines

Borna Libertines is an artist who creates mixed-media collages by reconstituting torn-up snatches of popular artifacts, some of which depict advertisements. His compositions feature text, pure blocks of color, commercial imagery, and graffiti placement, all remixed to convey humor, eroticism, and sociopolitical critique.

Borna Libertines builds collages of posters in which one has been placed over another or others, and the top poster or posters have been ripped, revealing to a greater or lesser degree the poster or posters underneath.

This radical re-appropriation of an otherwise ordinary material enables him to capture the spirit of the times and the image of a society driven by communication, which expresses itself above all through its obsession with current affairs and the omnipresence of the media. His art brings the streetscape into the space.

Borna Libertines is an electronic techno music artist based in New York City and a Collage Graffiti Streat Artist.

Borna has released one LP, Memory Leak, and 4 EP:s Tengo Lo Que Tengo, A Darkness, EP Inside My Mind EP Into The Shadows. Solo ART Exhibition in Hashtag Galklery – Mexico City, and Solo at Hotel Lone Rowinj Croatia

Art is dangerous, do not attempt at home.

Urban Erosion Artist Statement – Borna Libertines

Urban erosion is a natural phenomenon where materials in urban areas are gradually removed or dissolved by natural forces like rain, wind, and sun.

This phenomenon has inspired my artistic exploration as I see the remnants of urban erosion as raw materials that hold historical and cultural significance.

Instead of viewing erosion as decay or loss, I use the eroded material as a palette to create art that tells a story about the place and its history.

Urban erosion is more than just a physical change in the environment; it’s about the layers of history embedded in a place.

As humans, we interact with these spaces, leaving our marks and memories. My art engages with this interplay between past and present. I aim to reveal hidden layers and uncover memories, both positive and negative, that add depth to my work.

I believe that through my art, I can invite viewers to confront their memories and experiences, just as erosion exposes hidden layers. My focus on transformation is evident in my art.

Whether it’s the transformation of materials or the transformation of perception, I aim to challenge viewers’ perspectives and encourage them to see life through a different lens.

By using the remnants of urban erosion as my primary medium, I create art that invites people to reconsider what they thought they knew about a place.

My art serves as a lens through which viewers can see the world differently, and I hope to encourage them to embrace transformation and growth.

Category: Between